🔬 Learning research, plainly by Ask Poppy

Retrieval practice (the testing effect)

Quizzing boosts classroom learning: a meta-analysis of 222 studies

In short: Across 222 studies in real classrooms with 48,478 students, low-stakes quizzing improved achievement by a medium amount compared with restudying and other strategies. Feedback, repeated quizzes and quiz questions that match the final test all changed how big the benefit was.

PaperTesting (quizzing) boosts classroom learning: A systematic and meta-analytic review
AuthorsChunliang Yang, Liang Luo, Miguel A. Vadillo, Rongjun Yu, David R. Shanks
PublishedApril 2021 · Psychological Bulletin 147(4), 399–435
Study typeSystematic review and meta-analysis · Peer-reviewed
What we readAbstract only. Summary based on the published abstract only.
Summarized

What they did

The authors pooled data from 222 independent classroom studies of the "testing effect" and analysed what made the effect larger or smaller.

Who took part

48,478 students across the included studies.

What they found

Effect size: Overall g = 0.499.

Limitations

What this means for learners and parents

Put it into practice (free tools)

Citation

Chunliang Yang, Liang Luo, Miguel A. Vadillo, Rongjun Yu, David R. Shanks (2021). Testing (quizzing) boosts classroom learning: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin 147(4), 399–435. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000309

Related summaries